“As the sound of the playgrounds faded, the despair set in. Very odd, what happens in a world without children’s voices.”
– Miriam
SYNOPSIS: In 2027, in a chaotic world in which women have become somehow infertile, a former activist agrees to help transport a miraculously pregnant woman to a sanctuary at sea. – via IMDB
Well, well, well. I didn’t think I would dislike this movie as much as I did, as much flak as I may get for this. It came in recommended from my neighbour, though he said that there were a few scenes that the whole film basically hangs on. I didn’t realise that this movie had this mad love surrounding it and critical acclaim and all, and I went in relatively blind in terms of plot. It was evident in the first fifteen minutes that I was not going to enjoy it. I hated the camera work, it was jumpy and all over the show and gave me a headache. Then there was the dialogue, and I am sorry, there is nothing that will change my mind on the fact that I thought it was horrendous and awkward and didn’t flow right. There were more irritating characters than you could shake a stick at and the world may love Alfonso Cuarón but this was just not that great. It felt incredibly long, and I was ready to start bawling when I was sure we were nearing the final third, only to find that we were barely halfway. What annoys me is the fact that it had quite a good premise. It was interesting, it had potential, there were things to do and places to go and instead all that potential was squandered, and littered with bizarre and highly unlikable characters and events and things don’t flow properly. I was expecting some awesome plot twists, but none were delivered as promised. It was utterly predictable, and I was underwhelmed by the fact that the infertility issue was never explored more. Also, that ending! After all my pain and suffering, that’s how it went? Ugh. There were a few scenes that were done well and some things that were beautiful, especially when you think about it, but there were others with really flawed logic (such as a dude pushing a car all by himself, containing two women, along a muddy country round with hills). I feel that the cast was underused, as well. Julianne Moore and Michael Caine are big draw names (for me, anyway), and not much was really done with them when you get down to it. I know this is a pretty harsh review, but I was no fan. At all. And then when I saw the rave reviews and ratings coming back I was sure that I had missed something completely, and I did give this movie a fair shot. Overall, I was really hoping for more and instead I was left with this bitter taste of disappointment, and that sucks. Really.
I hate when that happens. Except a lot of the time for me I hear the critical acclaim given a film first and then I check it out only to be completely unimpressed. I am yet to see Children of Men but I’m starting to feel like I’m getting into that spot where the movie, however good it may (or may not) be it won’t rise above all the accolades it has gotten.
Too bad this wasn’t your film, Zoe. Oh well. On to the next, right?! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
It really is such a meh experience. Oh well. Hmmm, would be really interested to see what you think of it if you ever get back to it.
Yep, moving on to other things for sure hahaha!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Best one!
This one was so bad. The plot sounded like it had a lot of potential and then… nothing. Ugh. #nexttime
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kindest!
Meh, so not my thing.
LikeLike
I couldn’t disagree more. I think its a beautiful film and there’s so much going on. I don’t really know where i could find any fault with it, its nearly perfect
LikeLiked by 2 people
I know I am in the minority here but I just didn’t like it 😦
LikeLike
Aww – sorry you didn’t like it, Zoe! 😦 I’m afraid I’m with Mike – I thought this was quite a beautiful film. I HATE agreeing with Mike. Ugh! Well, I like you more than I like Mike, at least. 😉
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well, at least you still like me more!
PS: This movie still sucked though!
LikeLiked by 1 person
All this verbal hate, and it still got a 5?? Man, I’d hate to see what you’d say about a 2! :-p
LikeLiked by 1 person
LOL! I know, I struggled with it quite a bit 😛
LikeLike
Well, I have to say I completely disagree Zoe but everyone is entitled to their opinion!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah I was sure my opinion would be in the minority! 🙂
LikeLike
It’s been years since I saw this and I actually can’t remember anything about it which makes me think it probably didn’t wow me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If you don’t remember then I am inclined to agree!
LikeLike
Interesting take Zoe, I did enjoy this one the last time I saw it, but to each their own. I respect your opinion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Vinnieh. I was incredibly let down by the wasted potential.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a shame you didn’t care for this one! I can definitely see where you’re coming from on the camera work. And, yes, it’s so damn depressing that it’s hard to love. But I’m with Mike–there’s something beautiful about this film. Sad as hell and maybe a little slow at times, but still great. Anyway, I hope the next Blind Spot works out better for you! Nice work, as always! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you lady. I knew my opinion wasn’t going to be popular but this one really didn’t work for me at all
Ugh.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ouch! I have to disagree. Children of Men is a beautiful and clinical example of a brilliant dystopian movie that doesn’t rely on shoddy CGI or overused sci-fi references to tell its story. I do agree that Michael Caine was a big draw but it was also refreshing to see him in a role completely against his typecast British goodfellow (minus Get Carter). Long live Children of Men.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am glad to see that you enjoyed it, it just really didn’t work for me at all
LikeLiked by 1 person